GRINDINGGrinding machines

Grinding removes material from the workpiece a little at a time, with each of the very hard, fine abrasive grains on a fast-spinning wheel. It can finish hardened parts to µm-level accuracy. This page covers the types of grinding machines, how to choose a wheel and read its marking, dressing, and grinding conditions with remedies for burn and chatter, checked against public materials from wheel and machine makers and reports from universities and public research institutes.With the simulator below, you can run surface grinding conditions, spark-out in cylindrical grinding, and the rounding action of centerless grinding.

Finish with
a spark-out
and cut it through!

Chips, the Kezuriba mascot

▦Types of grinding machines

Surface grinderFinishes flat surfacesCylindrical grinderFinishes shaft ODInternal grinderFinishes bore IDCenterlessNo centers, mass production
Illustration

Surface grinderSurface grinding machine

Horizontal spindle, reciprocating tableThe periphery of a straight wheel grinds a workpiece on a table that reciprocates left and right, and the saddle's cross feed covers the whole surface. The training machine at Niigata University (magnetic chuck, hydraulic table) is of this type[9][10]

Horizontal spindle, rotary tableThe periphery of a straight wheel grinds a workpiece on a rotating table[9]

Vertical spindle, reciprocating table / vertical spindle, rotary table (rotary)Grinds with the face of a cup, ring or segment wheel. The rotary-table type is sold as a rotary surface grinder[9][11]

Double-disc surface grinderTwo disc wheels facing each other grind both sides of the workpiece at the same time (through-feed and carrier types)[9]

Bridge-type (gantry) surface grinderA gantry-type structure for large workpieces[11]

Profile grinderA compact machine that dresses the wheel to a profile and grinds flat surfaces and shapes (grooves, steps, radii, etc.)[11]

Best forWork that needs uniform thickness and parallelism on flat surfaces. The training exercise at Niigata University is to finish to a specified thickness of ±0.005 mm and achieve parallelism. Steel workpieces are held by attracting them to a magnetic chuck. There is also a public research institute example of mirror-grinding cemented carbide to Ra 2.1 nm with a superabrasive wheel[10][12][13]

Cylindrical grinderCylindrical grinding machine

Traverse grindingWith the wheel infed a set amount in the radial direction, the workpiece is reciprocated along its axis to grind it. Suited to shafts and rolls longer than the wheel width; accuracy is easy to keep stable, but it tends to take time[14][9]

Plunge grindingThe wheel is pushed in radially on the workpiece and grinds the whole wheel-width area at once. Suited to stepped shapes and mass production, with short cycle times. On long workpieces, deflection and waviness tend to appear[14][9]

Angular grinding (angle-slide plunge)The wheelhead is tilted and infed at an angle to grind the OD and the shoulder face (and tapers too) in one clamping. It is easy to hold the positional relationship and angle accuracy between the OD and the face[14][9][11]

Best forThe OD of rotating parts such as shafts and rolls (traverse for long ones, plunge for stepped parts and mass production, angular for grinding the OD and face in succession). The workpiece is supported between centers and driven by a dog, or held in a chuck[14][8]

Internal grinderInternal grinding machine

Standard typeThe workpiece rotates, and a wheel smaller than the bore rotates inside the hole to grind it[9]

Planetary type (revolving wheel spindle)The wheel spindle revolves inside the bore while grinding[9]

Centerless type / shoe typeInternal grinding also has centerless and shoe-type methods[9]

Best forBore diameters. Some models have two or four wheel spindles, and some are for long workpieces.[11][9]

Centerless grinderCenterless grinding machine

Through-feedThe axis of the regulating wheel is tilted slightly, which gives the workpiece rotation and axial feed at the same time, so it is ground continuously as it passes over the work rest blade. The faster the regulating wheel turns and the larger the tilt angle, the faster the feed. No loading and unloading is needed, so it is highly efficient for continuous work. In through-feed, the regulating wheel is often tilted about 3°[15][9][16]

In-feed (plunge, stop grinding)The grinding wheel is infed toward the workpiece while the positions of workpiece, blade and regulating wheel are kept. Stepped and radiused shapes can also be ground[15][9]

End-feed and tangential feedOther methods. Choose by shape, accuracy and productivity[15][9]

Best forWork that grinds the outside of cylindrical parts such as pins, rollers and shafts in large quantities and with high accuracy, without center holes. The workpiece is supported at three points: the grinding wheel, the blade (support blade) and the regulating wheel, so roundness comes out with little stock, and the blade makes long workpieces resistant to deflection[15][17]

Tool and cutter grinderTool and cutter grinding machine

Best forSharpening and regrinding of cutting tools such as tools (lathe bits), drills, milling cutters, hobs, broaches, pinion cutters and end mills[9]

Gear grinder and thread grinderGear grinding / thread grinding machine

Best forTooth flanks of gears after hardening, and threads such as ball screws. Gear grinders and thread grinders are in the product lines of grinding machine makers, and thread grinders are essential for grinding precision ball screws[11][18][9]

Compare gear-cutting methods →

Jig grinderJig grinding machine

Best forFinishing of holes and contours that need accuracy of 1/1000 mm or better, such as precision progressive dies and optical parts. It has a chopping stroke, in which the wheel reciprocates up and down (95–135 mm in Mitsui Seiki's comparison table)[18]

Multi-function grinder and center-hole grinderMulti-process grinder / center hole grinder

Best forHas multiple wheel spindles and grinds OD, ID, etc. in succession on one machine (shorter setup, better accuracy, smaller footprint). A center-hole grinder finishes the center holes that serve as the datum for cylindrical grinding[11]

▶Grinding simulator

In surface grinding, changing the wheel, table speed, depth of cut and stock allowance instantly changes the number of passes and time, the specific material removal rate Q′, the equivalent chip thickness heq, the speed ratio, the contact length and the tendency to burn. In cylindrical grinding, you can see how the actual size lags behind the command because of workpiece stiffness and wheel sharpness, and how spark-out catches up; in centerless grinding, how the workpiece gets rounder the longer it turns.

    ◎What is grinding?

    ◉The five factors of a grinding wheel and how to read the marking

    Abrasive types

    SymbolAbrasiveMain usesKnoop hardness
    ABrown alumina (A type)Raw and heat-treated (quenched and tempered) carbon and alloy steel. Free grinding of general steel, precision grinding of raw material[3][4][19]2050
    WAWhite alumina (A type)Precision grinding and light grinding of hardened steel (HRc50 or higher)[3][4][19]2070
    PAPink alumina (A type, Noritake's symbol)General grinding of tool steel, alloy steel (HRc50 or higher) and cast iron[3]2060
    SAMonocrystalline alumina (A type)High-efficiency grinding of hardened steel and cast iron[3]2060
    CXCX (Noritake's A-type abrasive for high-precision, high-efficiency grinding)High-efficiency, long-life grinding of carbon steel, tool steel, alloy steel, cast iron and stainless steel[3]2190
    CBlack silicon carbide (C type)Non-ferrous metals, non-metals, cast iron[4][3][19]2500
    GCGreen silicon carbide (C type)Cemented carbide[4][3][19]2500
    CBN (B)Cubic boron nitride (superabrasive)Ferrous metals (hardened steel, etc.). Next to diamond in hardness and thermal conductivity[3][4]4700
    SD (diamond)Synthetic diamond (superabrasive)Non-ferrous metals and non-metals such as cemented carbide, cermet, ceramics, glass, ferrite and stone. The hardest material on earth, with high thermal conductivity too[3][4]7000–8000 (Noritake) / about 7000 (Kure Grinding Wheel)

    Bond

    Reading a marking

    Abrasive
    Grain size
    Grade
    Soft (A)Hard (Z)The strength of the force holding the grains. The more bond, the harder
    Structure
    The smaller the number, the more grains and the "denser"; the larger, the more "open" (grain percentage is from Noritake's table)
    Bond

    Effective hardness and how to choose

    ✦Truing and dressing

    Normal state

    When the edges dull, the grains fracture moderately and new edges appear. Good surface finish and little wheel wear[5]

    Shedding

    The grade is too soft for the conditions, and the grains fall out almost whole. It cuts well, but wheel wear is high, the surface turns rough, the form breaks down, and grains that came out also cause scratches[5][23]

    Loading

    The pores are blocked and the chips have nowhere to go. Likely with soft, sticky materials such as aluminum, copper and stainless steel, and in dry grinding of castings and stone. Grinding force rises, causing vibration, chatter, tearing and burn[5][23]

    Glazing

    The grain tips wear flat and no longer cut. Likely when the grade is too hard, the grains are not hard enough, or the wheel speed is too fast. Grinding force and heat rise, and chatter, grinding burn and grinding cracks appear[5][23][3]

    ≈Grinding conditions, burn and chatter

    Grinding burn and grinding cracks

    Main causes of burn and cracks

    Chatter, dimensional variation and roundness

    💧Grinding fluid and workholding

    Workholding

    ⚙Surface grinding setup

    1. Wipe the chuck face, then deburr and wipe the workpiece
    2. Place the workpiece at the center of the chuck with its long side parallel to the table motion, and hold it; check that it holds (if distorted, concave side down)
    3. Start the hydraulic pump and the wheel spindle, and bring the workpiece under the wheel by hand feed
    4. Set the stroke with the table dogs (left and right overrun 30–50 mm from the workpiece)
    5. Move the table left and right (about 10–12 m/min) and lower the wheel gently until it touches the workpiece surface
    6. Turn on the grinding fluid and rough-grind the whole surface with auto in-feed (roughing 0.015 mm) and automatic cross feed
    7. Finish to the specified size with a 0.005 mm depth of cut, and spark out at the end
    8. Stop the table, switch off the chuck magnetism (demagnetize), and remove the workpiece after confirming that the wheel has stopped rotating. Measure thickness (6 places) and parallelism

    Based on the training procedure at Niigata University[10]

    !Common mistakes

    For the causes and countermeasures of malfunctions (19 items) and for safety and regulations, go to Grinder maintenance and safety.

    ↗Learning path

    1. Safety and handling grinding wheelsGuard, test run (at least 1 minute at start of work, at least 3 minutes after a wheel change), maximum operating speed, no side grinding, ring test. Wheel replacement only after special training
    2. Read the wheel markingBreak a marking such as WA 60 K 7 V into abrasive grain, grain size, grade (hardness), structure, and bond
    3. Make a parallel plate on a surface grinderChuck handling, stroke setting, roughing and finishing depth of cut, spark-out, measuring thickness and parallelism
    4. Change the cutting action with truing and dressingChange the dresser feed and depth of cut, and see how surface finish, sharpness, and burn tendency change
    5. Tell the wheel condition from the chipsJudge the wheel condition from shedding, loading, glazing, and the shape of the chips
    6. Cylindrical grinding: center work, traverse and plungeCenter holes, lathe dog, tailstock pressure, and the cycle of rough → fine → finer grinding → spark-out
    7. Think about conditions in numbersCalculate wheel speed, speed ratio, Q′, and grinding ratio, so you can explain the causes of burn, chatter, and size scatter from the conditions
    8. On to specialized grindingInternal, centerless, superabrasive (CBN, diamond) wheels, gear grinding

    Put together by the Kezuriba editorial team.

    ƒCommon formulas

    Wheel speed

    Vs = π × Ds × ns ÷ 60000

    • Vs: wheel speed (m/s)
    • Ds: wheel outside diameter (mm)
    • ns: wheel rotational speed (min⁻¹)
    Example (estimate): Ds = 205 mm, ns = 3000 min⁻¹ → Vs = 3.1416 × 205 × 3000 ÷ 60000 ≈ 32.2 m/s (within range for a 33 m/s wheel)[3]

    Work speed (cylindrical grinding)

    Vw = π × dw × nw ÷ 1000

    • Vw: work speed (m/min)
    • dw: workpiece diameter (mm)
    • nw: workpiece rotational speed (min⁻¹)
    Example: Oak Ridge National Laboratory test: OD 4 in (101.6 mm), headstock nominal 100 min⁻¹ → Vw = 3.1416 × 101.6 × 100 ÷ 1000 ≈ 31.9 m/min ≈ 0.53 m/s (estimate; in the test the rotational speed was changed automatically to keep the surface speed constant)[25]

    Speed ratio

    q = Vs ÷ Vw (use the same units)

    • q: speed ratio (dimensionless)
    • Vs: wheel speed
    • Vw: work speed / table speed
    Example: Tochigi Prefectural Industrial Technology Center, surface grinding: Vs 25.8 m/s, table 10 m/min (0.167 m/s) → q = 25.8 ÷ 0.1667 ≈ 155 (estimate)[5][22]

    Specific material removal rate (grinding productivity)

    Q′ = ae × Vw

    • Q′: removal rate per 1 mm of wheel width (mm³/(mm·s))
    • ae: depth of cut (mm)
    • Vw: work speed / table speed (mm/s)
    Example: Tochigi Prefectural Industrial Technology Center: ae 5 µm, table 10 m/min → Q′ = 0.005 × 166.7 ≈ 0.83 mm³/(mm·s) (estimate)[29][25][7][30]

    Specific material removal rate in plunge grinding

    Q′ = π × dw × vfr

    • Q′: mm³/(mm·s)
    • dw: workpiece diameter (mm)
    • vfr: radial in-feed rate of the wheelhead (mm/s)
    Example: Oak Ridge: in-feed rate 0.03638–0.10914 in/min, grinding until the diameter is reduced by about 1 in from 4 in → π × 3.5 × 0.03638 ≈ 0.400, π × 3.5 × 0.10914 ≈ 1.200 in³/(min·in). Matches the paper's Q′ = 0.4–1.2 (≈ 4.3–12.9 mm³/(mm·s))[25]

    Equivalent chip thickness

    heq = ae × Vw ÷ Vs = Q′ ÷ Vs

    • heq: equivalent chip thickness (mm; often expressed in µm)
    • ae: depth of cut (mm)
    • Vw: work speed (mm/s)
    • Vs: wheel speed (mm/s)
    Example: Tochigi Prefectural Industrial Technology Center: Q′ 0.83 mm³/(mm·s), Vs 25.8 m/s → heq = 0.83 ÷ 25800 ≈ 3.2 × 10⁻⁵ mm ≈ 0.032 µm (estimate)[29]

    Grain depth of cut (Noritake)

    Cylindrical: g = 2a (v/V) √(1/D + 1/d) √t / Internal: g = 2a (v/V) √(1/D − 1/d) √t / Surface: g = 2a (v/V) √(t/D)

    • g: grain depth of cut (mm)
    • a: spacing between abrasive grain cutting edges (mm)
    • v: work speed (m/min)
    • V: wheel speed (m/min)
    • D: wheel diameter (mm)
    • d: workpiece diameter (mm)
    • t: wheel depth of cut (mm)
    Example (relative comparison, estimate): in surface grinding, doubling v → g doubles (the wheel acts softer)[5]

    Contact length (Noritake)

    l = √t ÷ √(1/D ± 1/d) (+ for cylindrical, − for internal) / Surface: l = √(t × D)

    • l: contact length (mm)
    • t: wheel depth of cut (mm)
    • D: wheel diameter (mm)
    • d: workpiece diameter (mm)
    Example (estimate): surface grinding, D = 205 mm, t = 0.01 mm → l = √(0.01 × 205) ≈ 1.43 mm[5]

    Grinding ratio

    G = volume of workpiece removed ÷ volume of wheel wear → wheel wear volume = removed volume ÷ G

    • G: grinding ratio (dimensionless)
    Example: Oak Ridge: 52100 steel (HRC58–60), 29A (fused alumina) wheel, Q′ 0.6 in³/(min·in) (6.45 mm³/(mm·s)) → depending on the grinding fluid, G = 3.9 (no EP) to 34.7 (high EP). With a sol-gel wheel (3M), 33.2–219.4[25][28][31]

    Specific grinding energy

    u = P ÷ Qw = Ft × Vs ÷ (Q′ × b)

    • u: specific grinding energy (J/mm³)
    • P: grinding power (W)
    • Qw: removal rate (mm³/s)
    • Ft: tangential grinding force (N)
    • Vs: wheel speed (m/s)
    • b: grinding width (mm)
    Example: Oak Ridge: 52100 steel, 29A wheel, Vs 30.5 m/s, Q′ 0.6 in³/(min·in) → u = 8.7–11.2 hp·min/in³ ≈ 24–31 J/mm³ (converted). Over all conditions, 7.1–13.3 hp·min/in³ ≈ 19–36 J/mm³[25][30]

    Grinding heat entering the workpiece (outline of JTEKT's model)

    H = Ft × (Vs + Vw), Hw = Rw × H, qw = Rw × Ft × (Vs + Vw) ÷ (lc × b)

    • H: grinding heat (W)
    • Ft: tangential grinding force (N)
    • Vs: wheel speed (m/s)
    • Vw: work speed (m/s)
    • Rw: fraction of the heat going to the workpiece (0–1)
    • lc: contact length (mm)
    • b: workpiece width (mm)
    • qw: heat flux into the workpiece (W/mm²)
    Example (estimate): Ft = 30 N, Vs = 30 m/s, Vw = 0.17 m/s, Rw = 0.8, lc = 1.43 mm, b = 15 mm → H ≈ 905 W, Hw ≈ 724 W, qw ≈ 34 W/mm² (the values are placeholders to show how to use the formulas)[30]

    Proportionality of normal grinding force to removal rate

    Fn = kc × Z′ (JTEKT 2007) / Fn = a × Dactual + b (JTEKT 2013)

    • Fn: normal grinding force (N)
    • kc: slope of normal force against grinding rate (grinding characteristic)
    • Z′: grinding rate (mm³/(mm·s))
    • a: wheel sharpness (proportionality constant; it gets larger as sharpness drops)
    • Dactual: actual depth of cut
    • b: force from the hydrodynamic pressure of the coolant
    Example (relative comparison, estimate) → at the same Z′, if a is 1.5 times larger (sharpness drops), Fn is also 1.5 times and so is the deflection[30][7]

    First-order lag of the actual depth of cut (deflection) and spark-out

    Dactual = Dcom × (1 − e^(−t/τ)), τ = a × π × D × b ÷ (K × V)

    • Dactual: actual depth of cut
    • Dcom: commanded depth of cut
    • t: time (s)
    • τ: time constant (s)
    • a: wheel sharpness
    • D: workpiece diameter
    • b: grinding width
    • K: workpiece stiffness (N/µm)
    • V: wheel speed
    Example: JTEKT: in the same workpiece, a low-stiffness section of 4.4 N/µm and a high-stiffness section of 13.8 N/µm → since τ is inversely proportional to stiffness, τ in the low-stiffness section is 13.8 ÷ 4.4 ≈ 3.1 times that in the high-stiffness section (estimate). In the paper too, the low-stiffness section needed a long fine-grinding time for the deflection to settle[7][10]

    Stock left during spark-out (derived from the first-order lag model)

    r(t) = r0 × e^(−t/τ)

    • r: stock left (difference between the commanded position and the actual size, mm)
    • r0: stock left at the moment the in-feed stops (= deflection e = Fn ÷ K)
    • t: spark-out time (s)
    • τ: time constant (deflection lag)
    Example (estimate): Fn = 44 N, K = 4.4 N/µm → r0 = 10 µm. With τ = 2 s, a 4 s spark-out reduces it to about 1.4 µm[7][10]

    Surface grinding setup calculations (geometric relations)

    Number of passes N = stock allowance ÷ ae (rounded up); time per stroke ≈ (L + 2 × overrun) ÷ Vw; number of cross feeds per layer ≈ workpiece width ÷ cross feed

    • L: workpiece length (mm)
    • Overrun: distance the table travels past the end of the workpiece (mm; Niigata University example 30–50 mm)
    • Vw: table speed (mm/s)
    • ae: depth of cut per pass (mm)
    Example (estimate): stock allowance 0.1 mm, of which 0.08 mm by roughing at 0.015 mm and 0.02 mm by finishing at 0.005 mm → roughing 0.08 ÷ 0.015 = 5.3 → 6 passes, finishing 4 passes. With L = 100 mm, overrun 40 mm, Vw = 10 m/min (166.7 mm/s), one stroke ≈ 1.08 s[10]

    Rounding action in centerless grinding (Micron Seimitsu example)

    e_n = e0 × (1 − r)^n

    • e_n: form error after n revolutions (mm)
    • e0: initial form error (mm)
    • r: reduction per revolution
    • n: number of workpiece revolutions
    Example: Micron Seimitsu: e0 = 0.1 mm, r = 10 %, n = 50 → 0.1 × 0.9^50 ≈ 0.00052 mm ≈ 0.5 µm (matches the “0.5 µm” in the source)[15]

    What happens when you change the conditions

    If you…Then…
    Raise wheel speed VsBurn risk increases (more heat is generated). Grain depth of cut gets smaller and the wheel acts harder[21][6][5]
    Raise depth of cut aeRemoval rate, grinding force, and heat rise, and burn becomes more likely. Grinding ratio G falls (the biggest effect)[21][6][28]
    Raise Vw and lower ae at the same removal rate Q′ (fast and thin)The peak workpiece temperature drops and burn is less likely. Grinding ratio also rises[30][28][31]
    A long time since the last dressing (glazing and loading progress)Grinding force and heat rise, making burn and chatter more likely[5][23][6]
    Faster dressing lead and larger dressing depthSharper cutting and less burn, but a rougher surface[21][3]
    The grinding fluid does not reach the grinding point, or has poor lubricityBurn and cracks become more likely[21][6][22][32]
    Low stiffness of the workpiece or machineThe lag of the actual depth of cut (time constant) grows and spark-out takes longer. If it is insufficient, steps and form errors remain[7][10]
    Lengthen the spark-outSurface finish, dimensional accuracy, and roundness improve (the stock left decays exponentially). Too little spark-out causes poor roundness[10][7][8]
    Change both Vw and Vs while keeping Vw ÷ Vs constantThe effective hardness of the wheel does not change[5]
    The workpiece and wheel expand thermally during grindingYou cut away the swollen portion during grinding, and the part shrinks as it cools, leaving it undersize (in a Nihon University example, 28.3 µm of extra in-feed)[14][34]
    Raise removal rate Q′Specific grinding energy u tends to fall (less energy to remove the same volume), but power P = u × Q′ × b rises[25]

    Figures from public sources

    📚Sources

    We checked published technical documents and technical reports from grinding wheel and grinding machine makers, reports and training materials from universities and public testing institutes, and reports from public research institutions on 2026-10-14. Grinding conditions vary greatly with the wheel, workpiece, and machine, so start from the wheel maker's recommended values and the machine's instruction manual.

    1. Kure Grinding Wheel, “Grinding wheel basics: ‘What is grinding’ (definition, features and drawbacks)”
    2. Kure Grinding Wheel, “Grinding wheel basics: ‘Where grinding fits’ (classification of machining)”
    3. Noritake, “General-purpose products general catalog vol.3 (NORITAKE PROFESSIONAL SERIES), technical data: grinding wheel markings, overview of grinding wheels (abrasive grain, grain size, grade, structure, bond), truing/dressing, grinding oil (Noritake Cool)”
    4. Kure Grinding Wheel, “Grinding wheel basics: ‘Abrasive grain’ (grains in use and their applications, superabrasives)”
    5. Noritake, “Technical support information: ‘Grinding basics’ (the four conditions of a wheel, chip shapes, grain depth of cut, contact length, effective hardness of the wheel)”
    6. JTEKT (JTEKT Grinding Tool), “Grinding technology site, technical column: ‘What are grinding burn and grinding cracks? Mechanism, causes, and countermeasures’”
    7. JTEKT, “JTEKT Engineering Journal No.1011 (2013), Yoritsune, Tano, Sakai, Murakami: ‘A study on workpiece deflection compensation in cylindrical grinding’”
    8. JTEKT (JTEKT Grinding Tool), “Grinding technology site, technical column: ‘Causes of and countermeasures for poor roundness in cylindrical grinding’”
    9. Kure Grinding Wheel, “Grinding wheel basics: ‘Types of grinding’ (cylindrical, internal, centerless, surface, tool, freehand grinding, cutoff, and others)”
    10. Niigata University, Faculty of Engineering, Machine Shop, “Training text, Chapter 12: ‘Grinding and accuracy measurement with a surface grinder’”
    11. Okamoto Machine Tool Works, “Product lineup (surface, form, cylindrical, internal, combination, center hole, and gear grinders, and more)”
    12. Kanetec, “General catalog p.43 (holding force of magnetic chucks, pole pitch and workpiece thickness, electromagnetic chuck standards, selecting grinding fluids)”
    13. Industrial Technology Institute, Miyagi Prefectural Government, “Equipment introduction: ‘Surface grinder’ (Nagase Integrex SGE-520SLD2-E2, cemented carbide machining example, revised 2019.10)”
    14. JTEKT, “Technical and information column: ‘Cylindrical grinder basics and a guide to identifying accuracy problems, with diagnostic checklist’”
    15. Micron Seimitsu, “Technical news: ‘Principle of centerless grinding: types of grinding and their characteristics’ (2022-06-29)”
    16. SME (Society of Manufacturing Engineers, USA), “Tips for Trouble-Free Centerless Grinding (May 2017)”
    17. Noritake, “NORITAKE TECHNICAL JOURNAL, Problem solving: ‘Tough Ace wheels for centerless grinding’”
    18. Mitsui Seiki, “Jig grinders (comparison table: stroke, table size, chopping stroke) / Machine tools top page (thread grinders)”
    19. Kure Grinding Wheel, “Grinding wheel basics: ‘Specification markings’”
    20. Kure Grinding Wheel, “Grinding wheel basics: ‘Bond’”
    21. Noritake, “NORITAKE TECHNICAL JOURNAL, Problem solving: ‘Techniques to suppress grinding burn and the Σ wheel, a vitrified CBN wheel for high-efficiency grinding’ (2020)”
    22. UNITED GRINDING (parent company of STUDER, BLOHM, and others), “Motion blog: Typical Grinding Errors – And How to Eliminate Them”
    23. JTEKT (JTEKT Grinding Tool), “Grinding technology site, technical column: ‘Shedding, glazing, and loading, and their effects on grinding’”
    24. JTEKT (JTEKT Grinding Tool), “Grinding technology site, technical column: ‘What are truing and dressing (differences in purpose and evaluation criteria)’”
    25. U.S. Department of Energy OSTI (Oak Ridge National Laboratory / Milacron), “Krueger, Yoon, Gong, McSpadden, O'Rourke, Parten: New Technology in Metalworking Fluids and Grinding Wheels Achieves Tenfold Improvement in Grinding Performance (2000, OSTI ID 771407)”
    26. Tochigi Prefectural Industrial Technology Center, “Research Report No.21 (2024), Yamashita, Kondo, Koike: ‘Estimating the grinding state using an AE sensor’”
    27. Kochi University of Technology, “Bachelor's thesis abstract (2006), Hirohiko Takahashi: ‘Automatic determination of wheel life in surface traverse grinding’”
    28. Kagoshima University, “Hideho Tanaka: ‘Grinding factors in heavy cylindrical grinding’, Reports of the Faculty of Engineering, Kagoshima University, No.20 (1978), pp.25-33”
    29. MDPI (Materials, full text obtained via Europe PMC), “González, Pereira, Fernández-Valdivielso, López de Lacalle: Comparison of Flank Super Abrasive Machining vs. Flank Milling on Inconel 718 Surfaces. Materials 2018, 11(9), 1638. doi:10.3390/ma11091638”
    30. JTEKT, “JTEKT Engineering Journal No.1004 (2007), Onozaki, Saito: ‘Development of grinding simulation technology based on the machining process’”
    31. Kagoshima University, “Hideho Tanaka, Toshimi Minami: ‘Performance of 19A wheels in heavy cylindrical grinding, and the capability of the grinder’, Reports of the Faculty of Engineering, Kagoshima University, No.17 (1975), pp.1-9”
    32. UNITED GRINDING (parent company of STUDER, BLOHM, and others), “Motion blog: The use of cooling lubricant for grinding”
    33. JTEKT (JTEKT Grinding Tool), “Grinding technology site, technical column: ‘Causes of and countermeasures for chatter in grinding’”
    34. College of Science and Technology, Nihon University, “Proceedings of the 64th Academic Conference, K-4, Ishita, Yamada et al.: ‘Effect of wheel thermal expansion on the amount of material removed in cylindrical grinding’”
    35. Japan Society for Precision Engineering (hosted in the Kanazawa University repository), “Takashi Ueda, Akihito Torii, Keiji Yamada: ‘Heat flow ratio in surface grinding of steel’, Journal of the Japan Society for Precision Engineering, Vol.60 No.11 (1994), pp.1616-1620”
    36. Osaka University, “Shigeki Okuyama: ‘Study on grinding heat’, doctoral thesis, summary (1981)”
    37. g23 Niigata University training
    38. g24 Tochigi Prefectural Industrial Technology Center
    39. g25 Kochi University of Technology
    40. g12 JTEKT
    41. g13 JTEKT
    42. g28 Oak Ridge