Learning Gears: How They Work, Terms and Manufacturing, through to Ordering from a Tool Maker (Basic to Advanced)
From beginner to advanced, this one article draws you a map of gears!


In a gear, tooth shape, sizing, manufacturing and measurement are all connected. This one article is for everyone from complete beginners to designers, production engineers and buyers who order gear-cutting tools from a tool maker. The tooth profiles in the figures are the real shapes, drawn by calculating the motion of the tool. At the end, using an automotive steering pinion and worm shaft as examples, it sets out what to tell the tool maker and what kind of drawings to hand over when requesting a quote.
How to read this article
| Course | Who it is for | What to read |
|---|---|---|
| Basic | You want to learn gear names and shapes, or you are looking at a gear data table on a drawing for the first time | History / What gears do / Involute / Type / Terms |
| Intermediate | You design, machine or inspect gears | Profile shift and undercut / Helical gears / Measurement and accuracy / How gears are made |
| Advanced | You handle gears finished by grinding, or the procurement of tools | Protuberance (the “bump”) / Flank modification / Chamfering / Ordering tools / Pinion example / Worm example |
Calculators are on the gear pages: Spur gears / Helical gears / Span measurement / Over-pin, Module table, Machining methods, Gear-cutting tools.
BasicHistory of gears: from wooden teeth to ground teeth
- 4th century BCThe earliest mention of gears in writing is often said to be Aristotle's “Mechanical Problems”. Who invented them, and when, is not known[68]
- c. 2nd–1st century BCThe Antikythera mechanism: a bronze gear device found in a shipwreck. It is thought to have used gears to calculate the positions of the Sun and Moon and the cycles of solar and lunar eclipses (estimated dates differ somewhat between sources)[69][70]
- 16th centuryGears were still made by hand, cut one tooth at a time with a cutter shaped like the tooth space. Examples of hand-cranked gear-cutting machines also survive[71]
- 1551–1612Mechanical clocks reach Japan. To match Japan's seasonal-hour system, in which the length of an hour changes with the season, Japanese clocks (wadokei) are developed[78]
- 1754–1767Euler discusses gear tooth shapes mathematically (said to be the first to present the involute tooth profile)[72][73]
- 1796“Karakuri Zui” is published, a book with drawings explaining how to make Japanese clocks and tea-serving karakuri dolls. A later survey of tea-serving dolls reported that the shape of the wooden gear teeth was almost the same as today's involute[79][80]
- 1825Airy publishes a general theory of tooth profiles. He shows that with the involute, meshing is maintained even when the center distance changes.[73][74]
- 1835In Whitworth's British patent, the mechanism for cutting gears with a hob is depicted[71][75]
- 1838, 1841Willis publishes an instrument for drawing tooth profiles and a design method, and recommends the involute tooth profile in his book[74]
- 1851Tanaka Hisashige's Myriad Year Clock (Mannen Jimeisho). Designated an Important Cultural Property[81]
- 1889Grant in the US patents a hobbing machine for spur gears (the earliest known hobbing machine patent)[71][75]
- 1896–1897Fellows in the US puts the gear shaper into practical use. It was the only machine that could cut internal gears at a practical speed[76][75]
- 1897Pfauter in Germany patents a hobbing machine that can cut both spur and helical gears[71][77]
- 1913Maag is founded in Switzerland. It is known for its gear-cutting machines that cut teeth with a rack-type cutter and its gear grinding machines with dish-shaped wheels[59][58]
- 1945Reishauer in Switzerland launches the continuous generating gear grinding machine, which grinds continuously with a threaded grinding wheel[62]
- 1990The last Maag gear machine is delivered, and production ends[58][60]
- 1998–1999The gear JIS standards are rewritten to align with ISO (accuracy: JIS B 1702-1; standard basic rack: JIS B 1701-1; and so on. “Reference pitch circle diameter” becomes “reference circle diameter”)[82][83]
- 2000s onwardFor automotive transmission gears, carburizing and quenching followed by finishing with continuous generating grinding becomes the mainstream[21][24]
BasicA gear's job is to change the speed, force and direction of rotation
A gear is a part that transmits rotation through meshing teeth. Everything is determined by the ratio of the numbers of teeth of the two gears.
| What changes | How it is determined | Example: 12 → 36 teeth |
|---|---|---|
| Rotation speed | Output speed = input speed × z₁ / z₂ | 1,200 min⁻¹ → 400 min⁻¹ (reduced to 1/3) |
| Turning force (torque) | Output torque = input torque × z₂ / z₁ × efficiency | 10 N·m → about 30 N·m (3 times) |
| Direction of rotation | External gears turn in opposite directions; with an internal gear, the same direction | Clockwise → counterclockwise |
| Direction of shafts | Bevel gears and worm gears bend it by 90° | — |
Speed and force are traded offSlowing down increases force, and speeding up reduces force. A gear is not a device that creates energy; it changes how “speed” and “force” are shared out (in practice a little is lost to friction on the tooth surfaces and so on).
BasicWhy is the tooth shape the “involute”?
If the tooth shape is arbitrary, the rotation speeds up and slows down during meshing, causing vibration and noise. To transmit rotation at a constant speed at all times, the tooth shape must meet certain conditions, and the typical curve that meets them is the involute[10][11].
- The force direction never changes: the contact point moves only along a single straight line called the “line of action”, and the force pushing on the teeth keeps the direction of that line. The load on the bearings stays steady
- Tolerant of center distance errors: even if the center distance between two gears shifts slightly because of assembly error or heat, the speed ratio stays equal to the ratio of the numbers of teeth (what changes is the backlash and the operating pressure angle)[11]
- Can be made with a tool with straight cutting edges: if you increase the number of teeth of an involute gear without limit, the tooth flank becomes a straight-sided “rack”. That is why a single tool with straight cutting edges (a hob or rack cutter) can accurately make gears with any number of teeth. The biggest reason the involute is used all over the world is that the tools are easy to make and the gears are easy to measure
Cycloid tooth profiles, which allow thicker tooth roots, are also used in clocks and similar devices. But they stop meshing correctly if the center distance shifts, so almost all power-transmitting machines use the involute[11].
BasicA map of gear types
| Shafts | Type | Common uses | Main manufacturing methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parallel | Spur gears | Reducers, machine tools, pumps | Hobbing / Gear shaping |
| Helical gears | Automotive transmissions, steering pinions (quiet, strong) | Hobbing → grinding or shaving | |
| Internal gears | Planetary gear mechanisms (automatic transmissions, robot reducers) | Gear shaping, Skiving / Broaching | |
| Rack | Steering, linear feed | Broaching, milling, rack planing | |
| Intersecting | Straight bevel gears | Differentials, hand tools | Gear shaping, forging |
| Spiral bevel gears | Rear-wheel differentials in cars, machine tool spindles | Dedicated gear cutting machines, grinding, lapping | |
| Skew | Worm gears | Large reduction ratio in a single stage (electric power steering reducers, lifts) | Worm: thread cutting, grinding, whirling; Wheel: hobbing, and molding for resin wheels |
| Crossed helical gears | Right-angle transmission under light loads | Hobbing | |
| Hypoid gears | Rear-wheel differentials in cars (offset shafts allow a lower floor) | Dedicated gear cutting machines, lapping, grinding |
BasicTerms to learn first
| Terms | In brief | Formula / guide value |
|---|---|---|
| Module m | The size of the tooth. The larger the module, the larger and stronger the tooth. Choose from the JIS standard values (table) | m = reference circle diameter ÷ number of teeth |
| Number of teeth z | The number of teeth. The ratio of the two meshing gears gives the speed ratio | — |
| Pressure angle α | The inclination of the force pushing on the tooth. 20° is the standard today. A larger angle gives a thicker, stronger tooth root, but increases the load on the bearings | 20° (14.5° and 25° also exist) |
| Reference circle (pitch circle) d | The circle that sets the size of the gear. The two reference circles of meshing gears roll against each other | d = m·z |
| Base circle db | The circle on which the involute's “string is wound”. The tooth flank exists only outside this circle | db = d·cos α |
| Tip circle da, Root circle df | The outermost point of the teeth and the very bottom of the tooth spaces | da = d + 2m, df = d − 2.5m (standard) |
| Pitch p | The distance along the reference circle to the next tooth. Meshing gears have the same pitch | p = πm |
| Tooth thickness s | The thickness of the tooth on the reference circle. Removing material here creates backlash | s = πm/2 (standard) |
| Bottom clearance c | The gap between the mating tooth tip and the root. Gives oil room to escape and prevents interference | c = 0.25m (standard) |
| Backlash | Play between meshing tooth flanks. With zero backlash, thermal expansion or errors cause jamming; too much causes rattle | Created by reducing the tooth thickness |
| Center distance a | The distance between the axes of the two gears | a = m(z₁ + z₂)/2 (no profile shift) |
| Contact ratio | The average number of tooth pairs in mesh at the same time. It must be greater than 1; the higher, the quieter | About 1.4–1.8 for spur gears |
45 gear terms, including profile shift, contact ratio, TIF and grinding notch, are collected with English and Chinese equivalents in the "Gears" section of the glossary.
On overseas drawings, diametral pitch DP (teeth per inch of reference circle diameter) is sometimes used instead of the module. m = 25.4 ÷ DP (conversion table).
IntermediateProfile shift and undercut: a remedy for gears with few teeth
When a rack-type tool cuts a gear with few teeth, the tool tip removes extra material from the tooth root and the root is cut away. This is undercut, which makes the root thinner and easier to break, and also reduces the range over which the teeth can mesh. With a standard tooth with a 20° pressure angle, it occurs when the number of teeth is roughly fewer than 17 (theoretical value; in practice, down to about 14 is often allowed)[10].
So the tool is moved slightly away from the center of the gear when cutting. This is profile shift, and the shift distance divided by the module is the profile shift coefficient x . A positive profile shift thickens the tooth root and reduces undercut, but if overdone the tooth tip becomes pointed.
Minimum number of teeth without undercut zmin = 2(1 − x) / sin²α
This figure calculates the tooth profile in your browser by moving the rack tool in small steps. It assumes a standard tool with a tip radius of 0.38m and a dedendum of 1.25m. If the actual tool shape (tip radius, tooth depth) differs, the way the root is cut away will also differ.
Profile shift is also used to match the center distance to a specified value, to equalize tooth strength between the two gears, and to reduce sliding. The center distance is determined from the sum of the profile shift coefficients of the two meshing gears (Spur gear calculator).
IntermediateHelical gears: don't mix up “normal” and “transverse”
Gears with slanted tooth traces — Helical gears — mesh gradually, so they are quiet and strong, and are the mainstay of automotive transmissions and steering pinions. In return, they produce axial force (thrust).
| Plane viewed | Module | Pressure angle | Used when |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal (perpendicular to the tooth trace) | mn | αn | The tool is defined in this plane (the hob's rack engages the gear at an angle) |
| Transverse (perpendicular to the axis) | mt = mn / cos β | tan αt = tan αn / cos β | Used to find the reference circle diameter d = mt·z |
- Helix angle β: the inclination of the tooth trace on the reference circle. Hand of helix (right/left): viewed with the axis upright, it is a right-hand helix if the tooth trace rises to the right
- External gears meshing on parallel shafts have the same helix angle but opposite hands
- In helical gears, the transverse pressure angle is larger, so undercut is less likely than in spur gears even with few teeth
The most common mix-up in quotes and ordersEven if a drawing says “module 2”, the tool is a completely different one depending on whether it is normal or transverse. For the specifications of a helical gear, please always state whether the module is normal or transverse (the Helical gear calculator can give you both).
IntermediateHow to measure tooth thickness and accuracy
Tooth thickness cannot be measured accurately with calipers. On the shop floor it is controlled using the following two “indirect dimensions”.
| Method | What is measured | Tool |
|---|---|---|
| Span measurement W | Across several teeth, between the tooth flanks on both sides | Gear tooth micrometer (disc-shaped measuring faces) |
| Over-pin (over-ball) measurement M | Outside of pins (balls) placed in opposite tooth spaces | Pins or balls + micrometer |
Accuracy is expressed by the shape of a single tooth (profile deviation), the direction of the tooth trace (helix deviation), the spacing between teeth (pitch deviation / cumulative pitch deviation), the offset of the tooth spaces (runout), and the tolerance for each sets the accuracy grade (see accuracy grade / error items). A gear testing machine records the tooth profile and helix as curve charts. When ordering tools too, decide at the outset how pass/fail is judged on these charts, and you will avoid disputes at acceptance.
IntermediateHow gears are made: cut → heat-treat → finish
| Process | How it works | Tools |
|---|---|---|
| Hobbing | A threaded (worm-like) tool and the gear rotate together at the meshing ratio while the tool feeds. The workhorse for mass-producing external gears. | Hob |
| Gear shaping | A gear-shaped tool strokes up and down while rolling with the workpiece. Also works for stepped (shouldered) gears and internal gears. | Pinion cutter |
| Skiving | A tool with its axis tilted rotates in sync with the workpiece at high speed. Fast for internal gears. | Skiving cutter |
| Broaching | One pass of a long tool cuts all the teeth at once. For internal gears, splines, and racks. | Broaching |
| Rolling | Dies press in and push the material up into teeth (no cutting). | Rolling dies, rack |
| Shaving | Shaves a thin layer off the tooth flanks before hardening to refine them. | Shaving cutter |
| Gear grinding | After hardening, a grinding wheel finishes the tooth flanks. There are continuous generating grinding with a threaded wheel and profile grinding, one tooth at a time, with a form wheel. | Grinding wheel, dresser |
| Honing | An internal-gear-shaped honing stone refines the tooth flanks after hardening and reduces noise. | Honing stone |
For gears that need strength, the teeth are cut while the material is still soft (soft machining), the surface is hardened by carburizing and quenching, and then the distortion caused by heat treatment is removed by grinding or honing (hard machining). The key is to leave the grinding stock (the amount to be ground off) on the teeth when gear cutting, and that is where the “protuberance” (the “bump”) in the next section comes in.
AdvancedWhat Is a Protuberance (the “Bump”)?
In briefA tool with a protuberance is a pre-machining hob or pinion cutter with a small “bump” on the corner of the tooth tip, shaped to cut a deliberately shallow relief into the root of the gear tooth. When the gear is later ground, shaved, or honed, the tip of the finishing tool does not touch the tooth root, so no step is left at the end of the finished surface[7][15][19].
Why a Step Is a Problem
A grinding wheel only grinds the tooth flank that the mating gear actually touches (the active flank) and does not go down to the tooth bottom. If you grind a gear that was pre-machined without a protuberance, a step about as deep as the grinding stock is left where the wheel runs off the flank. This is called a grinding notch. The tooth root is where bending stress is highest, so the notch becomes a stress concentration and lowers the rated bending strength of the tooth. The lower on the root fillet the notch sits, the greater its effect, and increasing the grinding stock makes the notch deeper[16][20].
The same goes for shaving: if the tip of the shaving cutter hits the fillet left by pre-machining, the cutter wears quickly and the tooth profile is damaged. With the relief from the bump, the shaved flank and the unshaved root connect smoothly[7][18][19].
How to Decide the Size of the Bump
Protuberance amount pr = finishing stock q + relief u remaining after finishing
- Finishing stock q (per side, perpendicular to the flank): the bump must always be larger than this. The difference u becomes the relief that remains at the root even after finishing[15][17][19]
- In one tool manufacturer's proven profile, with a 20° pressure angle, a 10° bump angle, a tool addendum of 1.4m, and a tip radius of 0.4m, the values are q ≈ 0.09 + 0.0125m, pr ≈ 0.129 + 0.029m [mm] (module 7 and below). For module 3, q ≈ 0.13 mm, pr ≈ 0.22 mm, and the remaining relief u ≈ 0.09 mm[15]
- Another tool manufacturer gives guideline values for shaving stock, in terms of tooth thickness, of 0.05–0.08 mm for m2.25 and below, 0.06–0.10 mm for m2.25–3.5, and so on[7]
- Keep the top of the relief (root form circle dFf) below the lowest circle that the mating tooth tip reaches (dNf = SAP, TIF). If the bump is made too large, dFf rises into the contact range and the tooth root also becomes thinner[15][19]
- Allow a margin for heat-treatment distortion and for centering error on the grinding machine (equalizing the stock removed from the left and right flanks)[15]
- For gears with very few teeth, the undercut that naturally forms during generation is enough, and a tool without a bump may be used[17][19]
| Tool profile code | Meaning |
|---|---|
| P, PP, PS, PSP | For pre-shaving. P = thin tooth with a tall addendum; S from the second letter on = semi-topping (tip chamfer); a final P = with protuberance |
| PG, PGP, PGS, PGSP | For pre-grinding. PGP = with protuberance, PGSP = with protuberance and semi-topping |
| S-TOP | Semi-topping profile for finishing |
The symbols are taken from a tool manufacturer's technical documents (per JIS B 4350)[7]. There is no single standard reference form for the protuberance; it is designed for each application[15].
With a protuberance, which manufacturer's gear grinder should you use?
Answer: having a protuberance does not mean you need a particular manufacturer's grinder.In the materials we checked, we found no document in which a grinder manufacturer specifies the pre-machining tool. Tool manufacturers say the bump amount is set on the tool side, based onthe finishing method, grinding stock, heat-treatment distortion, and the mating gear, while the grinder side matches it by adjusting the height and radius of the wheel tip (dressing) and the split of the stock between the flanks (phase alignment) to fit[7][15][16][20]. Conversely, once the grinder and wheel are decided, pass that information (how deep the wheel goes in) to the tool manufacturer: that is the right order.
In mass production of automotive transmission gears, a threaded wheel is rotated in mesh with the gear: continuous generating grinding is the mainstream, and when gears are ground, shaving is omitted[24][28][21]. Production machines use a sensor to measure the position of the tooth spaces that shifted during hardening, and align the gear so that the left and right flanks are ground equally before grinding[23][24][29].
| Manufacturer (country) | Continuous generating grinding (threaded wheel): examples | Others |
|---|---|---|
| Reishauer (Switzerland) | RZ 160 4.0 (φ160, m0.5–4, for automotive transmissions), RZ 260 4.0, RZ 160 KWS with a small-diameter wheel[25][26] | Describes its own continuous generating grinding as the industry standard for automotive gears[24] |
| KAPP NILES (Germany) | KX 100 DYNAMIC (φ125, m0.5–4.5, for automotive), KX 260 DYNAMIC[28] | KNG, ZE, ZP profile grinders (large diameter, large module)[27] |
| Liebherr (Germany) | LGG 180, LGG 280 (both generating and profile grinding)[29] | Also CBN electroplated wheels that need no dressing |
| Gleason (USA) | Genesis 200GX, 260GX[30] | Also profile grinders and honing machines |
| Nidec Machine Tool (Japan) | ZE16C, ZE26C (for mass production), ZE40A, and the successors ZFA160, ZFA260[31][32] | Also the ZI20A internal gear grinder |
| EMAG SU (Italy) | G 160, G 250, G 400[33] | Profile grinding: G 375 H, etc. |
| Qinchuan Machine Tool (China) | YKZ7230, YKZ7236, YKS7225A[34] | — |
Model names and ranges were checked against each company's official pages and technical documents (October 2026). Profile grinding (one tooth space at a time with a disc wheel) is slower, so it suits large-diameter, small-batch, large-module gears[24][27]. Gears with a small diameter and closely spaced shaft steps, such as steering pinions are hard to grind after hardening because the wheel interferes, and in some cases they are finished after hardening with a carbide hob[21]. Grinders that use a small-diameter wheel have also appeared[26].
For anyone who has heard that “a protuberance requires a Maag machine”
Maag of Switzerland is a gear company founded in Zurich in 1913, known for gear cutting machines that cut teeth with a rack-type cutter, and gear grinding machines that roll the gear between two dish-shaped wheels (the so-called Maag method; 0° and 15°/20° types)[59][58][61]. The cutters for Maag's gear cutting machines include, besides roughing and finishing types, a pre-grinding type, and with a rack-type cutter, profile modifications such as the bump (protuberance) could also be applied[58]. For this reason, pre-machining with a protuberance cutter, then grinding on a Maag grinder was once one of the standard combinations for large gears and high-precision gears. The test gears of old studies on tooth root strength were also made by Maag dry grinding[16].
However, Maag stopped manufacturing gear machines in 1989–1990 (the last gear cutting machine was delivered in 1990), and there are no new machines[58][60]. Maag grinders still running are kept in service by specialist companies that replace their controls[61]. Maag dry grinding is now regarded as an old method[16]. In other words, a protuberance does not mean you need a Maag machine. In today's mass production, the usual approach is to pre-machine with a protuberance hob and finish on a continuous generating grinder from a manufacturer like those in the table above. When finishing on a Maag grinder you already own, the way of deciding is the same: tell the tool manufacturer how far the wheel goes in (the depth the grinding reaches) and have them decide the bump amount.
Comparing the Maag Method and the Reishauer Method
The history of gear grinding is easy to follow through the methods of two Swiss companies. Both are Zurich companies; Maag ground gears with dish-shaped wheels, and Reishauer with threaded wheels.
| Maag method | Reishauer method | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | A gear company founded in Zurich in 1913[59][58] | Began in 1788 as a toolsmith in Zurich. Built its own thread grinding machine in 1928[62] |
| Grinding wheel | Two dish-shaped wheels | One threaded wheel (same shape as a hob) |
| How it works | 0° type: the gear is rolled against two wheels, generating the involute and grinding two flanks at the same time. 15°/20° type: the two wheels act as the left and right flanks of a basic rack, and the gear is indexed to the next tooth at each reciprocating stroke[61] | The threaded wheel and the gear rotate in sync at the meshing speed, and all the teeth are ground continuously (since the ZA in 1945; still called the “Reishauer method” today)[62][24] |
| Wheels and setup | The wheel can be used regardless of pitch (module), so tooling cost is low[61] | A threaded wheel is dressed with a diamond roll for each module and pressure angle before use[24] |
| Best suited for | High-precision small batches: shaving cutters, dressing gears, master gears, prototype and test gears, etc.[61] | Mass production such as automotive transmissions. Production machines with two workpiece spindles are the mainstay[24][25] |
| History | Gear machine production ended in 1989–1990. Today existing machines are retrofitted and kept in use[58][60][61] | 1977: electronic synchronization of wheel and gear. 1986: shift grinding, which moves the wheel along while grinding. 2009: the RZ x60 for mass production. 2021: the RZ 160 KWS with a small-diameter wheel. 2025: a hard skiving machine for internal gears as well[62] |
The relationship to the protuberance is the same for bothEven if the grinder type differs, the idea is the same: the cutting edge of the wheel should run out within the relief of the bump on the pre-machined gear. What you tell the tool manufacturer is the grinder type, the diameter down to which the wheel reaches (the depth grinding reaches), and the grinding stock.[15][16].
If You Grind All the Way Down the Root, Is the Bump Unnecessary?There are methods that grind even the root fillet, but grinding leaves tensile residual stress, so shot peening and an inspection for grinding burn are required; it is also expensive and used only for limited gears such as aircraft gears. When made correctly, an unground root is said to have almost the same bending fatigue strength[22].
AdvancedFlank Modifications: Deliberately Altering the Shape Slightly
Under load, the teeth deflect, and so do the shafts. If the involute stays exactly as in theory, the tooth tips collide at the start of mesh, or only the ends of the teeth are loaded heavily. So the finished shape is deliberately altered, in units of microns.
| Modification | Where | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Tip modification(tip relief) | Remove a little of the profile near the tooth tip | Softens the impact at the start of mesh and reduces noise and vibration |
| Crowning | Slightly bulge the middle in the lead (helix) direction | Prevents “edge loading,” where only the end of the tooth makes contact because of shaft deflection or assembly error |
| Helix slope modification | Slightly change the helix angle | Cancels out the shaft tilt that occurs under load |
Modifications are verified on a gear tester chart as “deviation from the target shape.” For gears finished by grinding, the modification is often applied on the grinder; for hob-finished gears, it is built into the hob profile. In either case, it is important to write the amount and range of the modification (the diameter where it starts) on the product drawing, and pass them on to the tool manufacturer and the grinding department together with TIF and SAP.
AdvancedGear Chamfering: Workpiece Side and Tool Side
A gear straight from gear cutting has sharp corners between the end face and tooth flank, and burrs remain. Sharp corners and burrs become brittle after carburizing and quenching, chip under load, and damage the transmission. Hardened burrs also shorten the tool life of later processes such as honing. If the end face is used as a datum or for clamping, burrs are not allowed, and chamfering also helps prevent injury when handling by hand[63][64].
Workpiece side: where to chamfer, and in what shape
| Chamfering | Where | How it is made / notes |
|---|---|---|
| Tip chamfer | The corner at the tip of the tooth profile (tooth tip) | Made at the same time as gear cutting with a semi-topping hob (profile code S). Unless the blank's outside diameter is made larger than the theoretical diameter by the amount of the chamfer, the usable flank is reduced. The size of the chamfer varies with the number of teeth[17][15][7] |
| Tooth-end chamfer | The corner between the end face and tooth flank (both ends of the face width) | Made after gear cutting with a separate tool. On both sides for spur gears; on the acute-angle side only, or both sides, for helical gears[7] |
- The end-face chamfer has tapered, parallel (flank only), and parallel (including root) as its three basic shapes[7][67]. The angle of a chamfer made by pressing is roughly 20–30°[63]
- A gear with an inclined end face can also be chamfered, but beyond 15° a check by calculation is needed[7][67]
- The product drawing should specify the chamfer's shape, amount (width and angle), and location, and the allowable amount of the secondary burr that appears on the flank side
Tool side: how to chamfer
| Method | How it works | Suitable gears |
|---|---|---|
| Pressing (rolling) chamfering Chamfer rolling tool | A gear-shaped tool that meshes with the workpiece crushes the corner of the end face. The material that rises up on the end-face side is removed at the same time by a deburring cutter mounted together with it[7][65][66] | Smaller gears up to about module 5. Very fast, even for planet pinions with cycle times under 10 seconds. Also suits shaft-type gears with no relief space below the tooth root[64][63] |
| Chamfering by cutting | A dedicated chamfering tool makes a hob-like generating motion on the end face of the workpiece: chamfering hob, fly cutter, end mill[65][63][64] | Gears larger than module 5. A fly cutter needs relief space below the tooth root[63][64] |
| Tip chamfer | Done at the same time as gear cutting, with a hob or pinion cutter that has semi-topping[7][15] | Gears that need a tip chamfer in the pre-machining stage before grinding or shaving (combined with a protuberance: PGSP, PSP) |
The "secondary burr" of press chamferingSome of the crushed material also flows onto the tooth flank and forms a bulge (secondary burr). If the next process is shaving or continuous generating grinding, this is rarely a problem, but with honing it affects tool life. The countermeasure is either to push the secondary burr in with a tool whose half circumference is a burnishing (smoothing) section, or to split hobbing into two passes, chamfer in between, and remove the burr with the second hobbing pass[63][64]. Chamfering units can also be built into hobbing machines, shaving machines and skiving machines[66][64].
When ordering a chamfering tool, tell the maker the gear data (as-cut tooth thickness, TIF), the chamfer shape and location, whether there is a shoulder and the tilt of the end face, the mating gear, and the tool's number of teeth, material and mounting type (for details, see the chamfering tool guide).
AdvancedOrdering from the tool maker: what to tell them and what to hand over
A tool maker can design the tool once it knows the gear data, how the gear will be finished, and which machine will cut it. Conversely, if even one item is missing or mixed up, the tool you receive cannot cut the correct gear. A tool maker's inquiry or order form is broadly divided into three sections: "Workpiece (gear)", "Tool" and "Machine", as the table below shows[35][36][7].
- Prepare the product drawing and the gear data table: How to write the data table is defined in JIS B 0003 (gear drawings). It lists the tooth profile, module, pressure angle, number of teeth, profile shift coefficient, reference circle diameter, tooth thickness (span measurement or over-pin measurement), accuracy, mating gear, and so on[39][37][38]
- Add what the data table does not cover: TIF (the diameter from which the effective tooth profile starts), finishing stock, tip chamfer, order of heat treatment, and machine data. These are the items most easily left out[35][7]
- Request a quotation: Put the items in the table below into a request form and hand over the full set of materials
- Check the tool drawing (approval drawing): Check the tool shape and dimensions calculated by the tool maker against the gear data and the machine
- Manufacture, delivery and trial cutting: Measure the first gear on a gear tester and accept it against the pass/fail criteria decided beforehand
| Section | What to tell them | What happens if it is missing |
|---|---|---|
| Workpiece (gear) | Module and pressure angle (normal or transverse), number of teeth, helix angle and hand, profile shift coefficient, tip circle and root circle diameters, face width, material and hardness, drawing number | The tool's reference profile cannot be determined |
| Tooth thickness: number of teeth spanned and span measurement, or ball (pin) diameter and over-ball dimension. Give both "finished" and "as-cut" values, in two lines. | A pre-machining tool is made to the as-cut dimensions, so it cannot be made from the finished dimensions alone[35][7] | |
| Effective tip circle diameter / effective root circle diameter (TIF) and the mating gear's data and center distance | The range over which the tooth profile is guaranteed cannot be fixed, and the relief under the protuberance (the 'bump') may extend into the meshing range[35][7] | |
| Finishing stock (per side), whether a protuberance is needed and its amount, tip chamfer | Grinding notch, insufficient chamfer | |
| Type and order of heat treatment, accuracy grade, profile and helix modifications | The allowance for heat-treatment distortion, the tool material grade and the pass/fail criteria go wrong | |
| Tools | Tool type (hob, pinion cutter, skiving cutter, shaving cutter, broach, etc.), roughing or finishing, number of starts and hand, accuracy grade (AA, A, etc.), material grade and coating, quantity | Productivity, accuracy and tool life differ from what was intended |
| Outside diameter, overall length, bore diameter, keyway (if undecided, have the tool maker set them from the machine) | It does not fit on the machine or hits a shoulder | |
| Machine | Machine model, maximum tool diameter and length, maximum shift amount, swivel angle, wet/dry | The cutting edges cannot be fully used by shifting, and tool life is short[35][40][41] |
| Annual quantity, target tool life, allowable feed marks (the unevenness left on the tooth flank by the hob feed) | The number of starts, material grade and feed cannot be decided[35] |
Set of materials to hand over
- Product drawing (with data table): The tool is designed from the workpiece's drawing number and data[7][35]
- Pre-machining dimensions and finishing stock: tooth thickness after gear cutting, stock to be removed per side
- Mating gear data and center distance (if the drawing does not give the TIF, have it calculated from these)
- Process plan: the order and method of gear cutting → heat treatment → finishing (grinding, shaving, honing, hob finishing after hardening)
- Machine specifications: model, maximum tool diameter and length, shift amount, swivel angle, arbor (tool bore diameter)
- Inspection criteria: how to measure tooth thickness (ball diameter, number of teeth spanned), accuracy grade, purpose and tolerance of modifications
- Quantity and tool life targets: annual quantity, cycle time
Some gear design software can output a "tool quotation request" report that collects the gear and tool data[56]. Drawings are often confidential, so check your company's procedures (such as a non-disclosure agreement) before handing them over.
AdvancedExample 1: Quotation request for a hob that cuts a steering pinion
Steering in passenger cars is mostly of the rack-and-pinion type[2]. The pinion is a helical gear with few teeth and a large helix angle that meshes with the rack (a round bar with teeth cut in it). Because of how it is mounted in the vehicle, the pinion and rack axes are not at right angles but have a crossing angle, and the rack is pressed against the pinion by a spring, so under light load it meshes on both tooth flanks[1].
How the pinion is made (as far as public sources tell)
- Gear cutting is mostly hobbing: A hob cuts intermittently with a row of teeth, so small ridges matching the feed (polygonal error) are always left on the tooth flank and cause the "sliding noise" of the steering. Lowering the feed reduces them but lowers productivity, so one study reduced them from 7.5 µm to 4.8 µm by revising the hob path and other factors[42]
- Two examples of heat treatment: examples of cutting non-heat-treated steel and then induction hardening[44], and of carburizing,[45] appear in patents
- Finishing: The diameter is small and the shaft shoulders are close, so a grinding wheel easily hits them. Finishing with a carbide hob after heat treatment is used in some cases[21][42]. Grinding with a small-diameter wheel is also possible[26]
Here, taking the "specifications modeled on steering" given in a technical report[1] as an example, let's draft a quotation request for a pre-machining hob (with protuberance) used in a hobbing → heat treatment → grinding process. The grinding stock, material, machine and so on are values assumed as examples in this article.
A small puzzle: The report's data table says only "module 2". But the reference circle diameter of 19.861 mm matches 9 × 2 ÷ cos 25°, so it can be seen that it is a normal module (for a transverse module it would be 9 × 2 = 18 mm). On a request form, always write "normal" so that the recipient does not have to work this out[1].
| Item | Example entry | Why it is needed |
|---|---|---|
| Workpiece (from the data table on the product drawing) | ||
| Drawing no. and part name | (your drawing no.) Pinion shaft | To check the request against the drawing |
| Tooth profile and basis | Involute, Normal system | Determines the tool's basic rack |
| Module and pressure angle | mn = 2, αn = 20° (bothNormal) | The tool is completely different depending on normal or transverse |
| Number of teeth | 9 | To check undercut and interference |
| Helix angle and hand | 25° left | Determines the hob's helix hand and setting angle |
| Profile shift coefficient | +0.3 (normal) | If you forget to write it, the tooth shape will not match |
| Reference circle diameter | 19.861 mm | For cross-checking the data (mn·z / cos β) |
| Tip circle diameter and root circle diameter | 24.261 mm, 16.861 mm (addendum 2.2, dedendum 1.5 mm) | Tooth depth differs from the standard. Match the tool's tooth depth and cutting depth to it |
| Tooth thickness (finished) | Teeth spanned 2, span measurement 9.600 mm (theoretical value; tolerance as on the drawing) | Basis for the finished gear |
| Tooth thickness (as-cut) | Span measurement 9.760 mm (= finished + 2 × grinding stock 0.08) | The pre-machining hob is made to this dimension |
| Over-ball measurement (reference) | 26.833 mm with a 4.058 mm ball (theoretical value for the finished gear) | Another way to measure tooth thickness. Write the ball diameter too |
| Effective tip circle diameter and effective root circle diameter (TIF) | Values from the product drawing (if none, ask for them to be calculated from the meshing with the mating rack) | So that the relief under the protuberance does not cut into the meshing range |
| Mating part | Rack (helix angle 5° right), crossing angle 20°, center distance 17.530 mm | To calculate the meshing range |
| Face width and shaft shape | Length of the toothed section, diameter of the shoulders on both sides and their distance from the teeth | Interference with the hob's outside diameter and the hob run-out length |
| Material, hardness and heat treatment | Example: low-alloy carburizing steel, hardness at the time of gear cutting. Gear cutting → carburizing and quenching → gear grinding | Tool material grade, allowance for heat-treatment distortion |
| Accuracy and modifications | Accuracy grade of the finished gear, profile and helix modifications (applied by grinding) | Pass/fail criteria for the trial |
| Finishing and protuberance | ||
| Grinding stock | 0.08 mm per side (perpendicular to the tooth flank) (example) | Determines the hob's tooth thickness and the size of the protuberance |
| Protuberance (bump) | Needed (no grinding notch may remain after grinding). In profile code terms, PGP | Prevents a grinding notch |
| Tip chamfer | Needed or not, and the amount (PGSP if needed) | Whether to break the tip corners before heat treatment |
| End-face chamfering | Shape (parallel type, etc.), amount, location, and the process in which it is applied (e.g., press chamfering after gear cutting) | Allowance for the bulge that appears on the tooth-flank side from chamfering. Whether to split hobbing into two passes |
| Machine and quantity | ||
| hobbing machine | Machine model, maximum hob diameter × length, maximum shift amount, swivel angle, arbor diameter (= hob bore diameter) | Whether it fits, and whether shifting lets you use up the cutting teeth |
| Cutting fluid | Wet/dry | Material grade and coating |
| Quantity and tool life | Annual quantity, target number of pieces per regrind | Number of starts, material grade, quantity |
| Feed marks | Allowable size of unevenness on the tooth flank | Affects sliding noise. Determines the number of starts and the feed |
| Hob preferences (write "up to you" if leaving it to the maker) | ||
| Number of starts and helix hand | 1 or 2 starts, left-hand helix (same hand as the gear) | Productivity and accuracy. With the same hand, the setting angle is smaller |
| Accuracy grade, material grade, coating | Example: Grade A, powder-metallurgy HSS, recoating allowed | Grade A is common for pre-machining |
| Outside diameter, overall length, bore diameter, keyway | Let the tool maker decide based on interference with the machine and shoulders | Interference with arbor and shoulders |
The tooth thickness and over-ball dimension in the table are "theoretical values with no backlash", worked out with the same formulas as the Span measurement / Over-pin calculations. In practice, apply the tooth thickness tolerance on the drawing (the amount by which tooth thickness is reduced). The span measurement is taken perpendicular to the tooth flank, so adding the grinding stock q (perpendicular to the flank) on both sides gives the as-cut value.
Watch out for undercut on a 9-tooth pinionIn a gear with few teeth like this example, undercut is avoided through profile shift and tooth depth. Fixing the tool's tip radius and protuberance changes the root shape, so it is safer to ask the tool maker for a drawing that confirms the root form (trochoid), undercut and TIF. See the profile shift and undercut diagram, where you can move the number of teeth and the profile shift coefficient to see the shape.
AdvancedExample 2: Worm shaft and worm wheel of electric power steering
In column-type and pinion-type electric power steering (EPS), the motor's rotation is reduced by a steel worm and resin worm wheel set. Resin is used to reduce rattle noise on rough roads and improve the steering feel[4][5]. There is a design in which the worm is pressed against the wheel by a spring so that backlash is always zero[4][3].
First, decide the "type of worm tooth profile"
A worm looks like a "screw", but there are five types, depending on which cross-section the tooth profile is straight in, and the tools used to make them differ as well. The types are covered by ISO/TR 10828, DIN 3975 and AGMA 6022, and JIS B 1723 (dimensions of cylindrical worm gears) also has a clause on tooth profiles[50][51][52].
| Symbol | Where it is straight | Main manufacturing methods |
|---|---|---|
| ZA | Straight in the cross-section containing the axis (axial plane) | Turned with a straight-edged tool. Milling and grinding are also used |
| ZN | Straight in a cross-section tilted by the lead angle (close to the normal plane) | Conical milling cutter or grinding wheel, tilted turning tool |
| ZI | Involute helicoid (same form as a helical gear) | Ground with a flat-faced wheel, or hobbed |
| ZK | Form made with a conical tool tilted to the lead angle (slightly convex in the axial plane) | Conical milling cutter or grinding wheel. The shape changes with the tool diameter |
| ZC | Concave tooth profile made with a convex-arc tool | Arc-profile milling cutter or grinding wheel |
For ZK and ZC, the "tool shape" is also part of the worm's definitionBecause the tool diameter and edge form determine the tooth profile, also write the outside diameter and edge form of the tool (grinding wheel) on the drawing and the request form. In the standard's worked examples, too, the wheel's outside diameter and the radius of the edge form are listed as data.[50][51].
How to cut the worm shaft, and tools
| Process | How it works | Tools |
|---|---|---|
| Thread whirling | Blades arranged on the inside of a ring-shaped cutter are spun at high speed and tilted to the lead angle around the slowly rotating workpiece to cut it. Many reports say it is fast and can eliminate grinding. Usually done dry[47][46] | Whirling ring + dedicated blades (inserts) |
| Worm milling | A rotating milling cutter cuts the thread groove. For ZA, ZN and ZK forms[51][55] | Worm milling cutter |
| Grinding | Finished with a grinding wheel after hardening. For ZK and ZI forms. The wheel's outside diameter and the radius of its edge form determine the tooth profile[51][50] | Threaded grinding wheel and dresser |
| Rolling | Material is pushed up by dies. A machine maker's literature says a precision rolling machine can make threads, splines and worms in a few seconds[57] | Rolling dies |
For worms for electric power steering, a whirling machine maker claims that it cuts "module 0.8–3, swivel angles up to 42°, dry, and reaches gear accuracy with no subsequent process" (a machine maker's claim)[48][13]. When ordering whirling tools, tell the maker your machine and spindle so that the cutter body can be chosen, and send the workpiece drawing. The tool maker then calculates the lead angle and blade shape from the drawing and makes dedicated blades. If you cut a multi-start worm in one pass, consult the maker beforehand because of machine constraints[46].
| Item | What to write | Why it is needed |
|---|---|---|
| Worm drawing | Outside diameter, root diameter, pitch (lead), number of starts, helix hand, length of the threaded section and incomplete thread section | Basis for the tool maker to calculate the cutting circle diameter, lead angle and blade shape[46][47] |
| Tooth profile type | ZA/ZN/ZI/ZK/ZC. For ZK and ZC, also the tool diameter and blade form | The type changes the tool's blade form and how it is tilted |
| Basis for module and pressure angle | Axial module or normal module; and in which cross-section the pressure angle is given | JIS worms are dimensioned by axial module, while the hob side is often expressed in the normal system[52][49] |
| Tooth thickness | Axial tooth thickness, or over-wire (ball) dimension and wire (ball) diameter | Basis for the finished gear |
| Material and heat treatment | Whether only the worm section is induction hardened, and whether it is cut before or after hardening | Tool material grade, and whether to keep a grinding step |
| Machine | Model, spindle, swivel angle range | Selecting the cutter body, and whether the machine can set the lead angle |
| Accuracy, surface roughness, coolant | Required accuracy and surface roughness, dry/wet | To decide whether to keep or skip grinding |
| Mating wheel | Number of teeth, material (resin), center distance | To check the meshing |
The hob that cuts the mating worm wheel
- As a rule, the hob has the same form as the worm: same hand of helix, same pressure angle, same tooth depth. Outside diameter = "worm tip circle + bottom clearance"[49][17]
- A hob of the same diameter sometimes cannot be made: A patent describes this problem. The resin wheels in EPS have a small module, so a hob with the same outside diameter as the worm is hard to make. Cutting with a slightly larger hob makes the gap at the tooth contact (crowning) too large and raises the contact pressure. The patent avoids this by forming the wheel teeth by injection molding[6]
- Making the hob slightly larger on purpose is also an idea: One source describes enlarging the hob slightly to move the contact toward the center of the face width, while another study finds that when regrinding shrinks the outside diameter the contact pattern changes, so making it larger has only a limited effect[49][53][54]
- Setting angle: The hob setting angle β is basically "the wheel's lead angle γc − the hob's lead angle γa" and it changes when the hob diameter changes. In an EPS reducer, there is an example where optimizing this angle reduced the fluctuation of output torque by 30%[3]
| Item | What to write | Why it is needed |
|---|---|---|
| Mating worm specifications | Number of starts, hand of helix, lead (axial pitch), pressure angle, tooth depth, tooth form type, outside diameter | As a rule, the hob has the same form as the worm[49][17] |
| Wheel | Number of teeth, material (steel, bronze, resin), throat diameter and its radius, center distance | The center distance during cutting, and whether to cut the rounded tip as well |
| Hob outside diameter | Same diameter as the worm, or if larger, by how much and the target contact position | The outside diameter determines the contact pattern[17][53] |
| Regrinding | How many times, and how far the outside diameter may shrink | Regrinding shrinks the outside diameter and changes the contact pattern[53][54] |
| Cutting method | Radial feed / tangential feed, setting angle | The setting angle changes with the hob diameter[3] |
| hobbing machine | Swivel angle, maximum hob diameter, length | Whether the machine can handle a large lead angle and a large-diameter hob[41][55] |
Common mistakes
- Not stating the profile shift coefficient or tooth thickness: The tool's tooth depth and tooth thickness cannot be determined. Tool makers' request forms always ask for either the profile shift coefficient or the tooth thickness (span measurement, over-pin)[7][35][37]
- Mixing up normal and transverse (axial for worms): It is not unusual for a specification table to say just "module". By JIS, the worm uses the axial module, while the hob is usually expressed in the normal section[1][52][49]
- Forgetting to state the hand of helix and number of starts: A worm wheel hob must always match the worm's hand of helix[49][35]
- Stating only the finished tooth thickness: A tool for the preliminary cut is made to the dimensions "after gear cutting"[35][7]
- Not telling the grinding stock and TIF: Pre-cutting with a tool that has no protuberance (the 'bump') leaves a grinding notch, which can lower the bending strength[16][7]
- Not telling the machine's limits: Without the maximum tool diameter, length, shift range, and clearance to a shoulder, the tool may not fit or may hit the shoulder[35][40][41]
- Not telling the order of heat treatment: The expected heat-treatment distortion changes, and so does the tool grade if you cut after heat treatment[7][42]
- Not deciding the worm wheel hob diameter and regrinding: A larger hob makes the gap bigger, and regrinding changes the contact pattern[17][53][54]
- Not stating the tool diameter for worms such as ZK: The tool diameter changes the tooth form[50][51]
Three short notes prevent most failures: ①Which surface the value is for (normal, transverse, axial), ②Which stage the value is for (after gear cutting, finished), ③Where the guarantee starts and ends (TIF, effective tip circle). Just adding these three notes greatly cuts the back-and-forth of inquiries.
FAQ
- If the module is the same, will it mesh with any gear?
- The module and the pressure angle must both be the same, and for helical gears the helix angle must also be the same (with opposite hand). In addition, the center distance must be right.
- Do I have to decide the tool form (hob tooth profile) myself?
- No. If you correctly tell the tool maker the gear specifications, the finishing method, and the machine, the tool maker calculates the tool form. What matters is avoiding missing or mixed-up information, and checking the tool drawing (approval drawing) from the tool maker.
- Can a gear with a protuberance (the 'bump') only be finished on a particular maker's grinding machine?
- No. The size of the protuberance is set on the tool side, from the finishing method, the grinding stock, and the mating gear. Once the grinding machine and wheel are decided, give that information to the tool maker (Grinding machine makers / The Maag method and the Reishauer method).
Sources
- JTEKT ENGINEERING JOURNAL No.1019 (2022) "Meshing Analysis of Rack and Pinion for Steering"
- JTEKT ENGINEERING JOURNAL No.1006 (2009) "Theoretical Estimation of Rack Swing Torque for Steering Caused by Rack and Pinion Meshing"
- JTEKT ENGINEERING JOURNAL No.1013 (2015) "Establishing an Analysis Technique for Meshing Fluctuation in Worm Reduction Gears for Electric Power Steering"
- JTEKT ENGINEERING JOURNAL No.1001 "Backlash Adjustment Mechanism of the Electric Power Steering (EPS) Reducer"
- JTEKT ENGINEERING JOURNAL No.1021 "Development of a Column-Type Electric Power Steering (C-EPS) with Improved Comfort"
- Patent JP4779267B2 "Electric power steering device and method of manufacturing its worm wheel"
- Tool maker's technical data on hobs (tooth form types, protuberance, number of starts, specifications when ordering)
- Gear Technology "From Design to Manufacturing" (grinding notch and protuberance tools)
- Gear Technology India "Gear Root Forms" (root shapes, grinding notch, dFf and dNf)
- Gear maker's technical reference (Gear Technical Reference)
- Measuring instrument maker's guide "Types of Gears" (Learning Machine Elements from Scratch)
- Machine tool maker's column "The Origin of Hobbing" (history of hobbing)
- Machine tool maker's product page "Steering Worms" (whirling machines)
- Machine tool maker's column "Whirling Machine Series – Part Four" (whirling EPS worms)
- LMT Fette "Verzahnen – Werkzeuge und Wissen / Gear Cutting Tools and Knowledge" (reference form of the protuberance, grinding stock, relief formulas)
- U. Kissling and I. Zotos "The Influence of a Grinding Notch on the Gear Bending Strength Rating", Gear Technology Nov/Dec 2018
- National Broach & Machine "Gear Manufacturing Methods – Forming the Teeth", Gear Technology Jan/Feb 1987
- J. P. Dugas "Gear Shaving Basics – Part I", Gear Technology Nov/Dec 1997
- K. Liston "Hob Basics Part II", Gear Technology Nov/Dec 1993
- Gear Technology "KISSsoft for Gear Manufacturing" (2022)
- Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review Vol.43 No.3 (2006) "Gear Machines and Precision Cutting Tools Supporting the Production of Automotive Transmission Gears"
- R. Errichello "The Pros – and Mostly Cons – of Fully Ground Root Fillets", Gear Technology Aug 2014
- US patent US5136522A "Stock dividing method and apparatus for gear manufacturing machine"
- Reishauer "Generating gear grinding" (Transmission Technology International, Sep 2018)
- Reishauer "RZ 160 4.0" product page
- Reishauer "Gear generating" (RZ x60 4.0, RZ 160 KWS, Transmission Technology International 2021)
- KAPP NILES model list (KX, KNG, ZE, ZP)
- KAPP NILES "KX DYNAMIC" product page
- Liebherr "LGG 180 / 280 / 400 M" product page
- Gleason "Genesis GX Series" product page
- Nidec Machine Tool "Gear grinding machines (external gears) ZE series"
- Nidec news release "Launch of the ZFA series gear grinding machines" (2024-10-16)
- EMAG「Gear Grinding Machines from EMAG SU」
- Qinchuan Machine Tool "Machine Tools" (gear grinding machines)
- LMT Fette hob inquiry/order form (Anfrage/Bestellformular)
- LMT Fette inquiry/order form for gear milling cutters
- Shimane University "Mechanical Drawing" Assignment 4: Design and drawing of a pair of spur gears
- Shimane University Assignment 4 reference drawing (example of filling in the gear data table)
- Japanese Standards Association JIS B 0003:2012 Gear drawings (preview)
- Nidec Machine Tool cutting tool tips "Hob (4)"
- Hobbing machine maker's product page (examples of maximum hob diameter × length, shift range, swivel angle)
- JTEKT ENGINEERING JOURNAL No.1019 (2022) "Analysis of Polygonal Error on Hobbed Tooth Surfaces"
- JTEKT ENGINEERING JOURNAL No.1008 (2010) "A Study on Physical Property Modeling of Steering Performance and Design of Transmission Elements (Part 2)"
- Patent application JP2005299854A "Pinion shaft" (example of induction hardening)
- US patent US7954395B2 "Steering apparatus" (example of carburizing a pinion shaft)
- Tool maker's thread whirling catalog (order flow)
- Gear Solutions "The whirling process for improved worm gears" (2003)
- Machine tool maker's application page "Solutions for EPS-Screws" (machine maker's claims)
- W. L. Janninck "Cutting Worm Gears with Standard Gear Hobs", Gear Technology Jan/Feb 1994
- M. Octrue「Evolution of Worm Gear Standards and their Consequences on Load Capacity Calculation」Power Transmission Engineering 2014
- W. P. Crosher「Tooth Tips: The five standardized worm gear tooth forms」Gear Solutions
- Japanese Standards Association JIS B 1723:2014 Dimensions of cylindrical worm gears (preview)
- International publication WO1988002829A1 "Worm wheel and method of hobbing same"
- M. Márton and D. Hollanda "The Deformation of the Gear Hob's Generating Surfaces Due to Re-Sharpening", Papers on Technical Science
- Tool maker's product page "Worm milling cutters / wheel hobs"
- Gear Solutions "Request quotes for tools a new feature in latest KISSsoft update" (2020)
- Machine tool maker's general catalog (precision rolling machines: threads, splines, worms)
- Gear Solutions "More MAAG for your Money" (2003, Maag's rack-type gear cutting machine and cutters)
- Historisches Lexikon der Schweiz「Maag, Max」
- lathes.co.uk "Maag" (end of gear machine production)
- Donner+Pfister "Gear Grinding Machines – MAAG Retrofit" (retrofit of Maag grinding machines)
- Reishauer "History" (company history)
- G. Klein "Chamfering and Deburring – the Underrated Process", Gear Technology Aug 2016
- G. Klein "The Evolution of Gear Chamfering", Gear Technology Sep/Oct 2018
- Nidec Machine Tool "Chamfering tools" product page
- Nidec Machine Tool cutting tool topics "Life of chamfer rolling tools"
- Liebherr "Gear tools" brochure (chamfer shapes, inclined end faces)
- Gear maker's technical data (1.1 Origins of Gears, etc., PDF)
- National Astronomical Observatory of Japan Library, rare materials exhibition poster "The Antikythera Mechanism"
- Nature 444 (2006) "Unraveling the mystery of the ancient Greek astronomical calculator known as the 'Antikythera Mechanism'" (Japanese summary)
- T. J. Maiuri "Hob Tool Life Technology Update", Gear Technology Mar/Apr 2009 (history of hobbing)
- Euler Archive「E330 De figura dentium rotarum」
- G. B. Airy "On the Forms of the Teeth of Wheels" (1825, annotated transcription by D. Roegel)
- University of Cambridge Department of Engineering "Gearing Research in Cambridge 1827–2000"
- MDPI Materials (2024) "Gear Hobs—Cutting Tools and Manufacturing Technologies for Spur Gears"
- American Precision Museum「Machine of the Month: Gear Shapers」
- Gleason-Pfauter "This is our story" (company history)
- Toyota Commemorative Museum of Industry and Technology, special exhibition archive "The Arrival of Clocks in Japan" (PDF)
- Kyoto University Rare Materials Digital Archive "Karakuri Zui" (Kansei 8, 1796)
- JST Science Portal "The wooden gears of the tea-serving doll" (2006-07-19)
- Cultural Heritage Online "Myriad Year Clock (by Tanaka Hisashige)"
- Gear maker's technical reference "Gear symbols and terms"
- Japanese Standards Association JIS B 1701-1 Standard basic rack tooth profile (established 1999-01-20)
More articles
NCCustom Macros and Subprograms for Beginners: M98, M99, G65, # Variables, IF and WHILE with Examples and Diagrams
NewsCarbide Tool Prices Revised for Orders from Oct 1: Inserts +25% or More, Solid Drills and End Mills “−25% to +10%” (Some Go Down)
News